Atiku Abubakar and Nigeria’s Privatization Legacy: Between Promise and Controversy

By DAYO ADESULU

When former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s name resurfaces in Nigeria’s political debates, one recurring theme is his association with the country’s privatization programme under the Olusegun Obasanjo administration (1999–2007). For critics, the initiative is seen as a dark mark of corruption, while supporters argue that it was a bold attempt to reform a broken public sector. But what is the truth behind the claims and counterclaims?

The Role Atiku Played

As Vice President, Atiku Abubakar chaired the National Council on Privatization (NCP), the government body tasked with steering the process of selling off state-owned enterprises. This made him the face of the policy, even though the actual work was spread across several agencies, including the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE). Former President Olusegun Obasanjo himself later admitted that Atiku was indeed in charge of the privatization drive during that era.

This much is true: Atiku did not merely play a ceremonial role. He actively pushed policies that aimed to reduce government’s grip on inefficient public corporations, with the hope of opening the economy to private capital and efficiency.

The Companies in Question

One of the most contested claims is whether Atiku successfully privatized big-ticket firms like NITEL (Nigeria Telecommunications Limited), NEPA (National Electric Power Authority), and Nigerian Airways.

The fact is more nuanced. Nigerian Airways was eventually liquidated, but its privatization was messy and left thousands jobless. Attempts to privatize NITEL repeatedly collapsed, with bids either failing or being reversed due to controversy and poor investor performance. NEPA, on the other hand, was unbundled into successor companies as part of reforms, but its full privatization did not happen until after Obasanjo’s government.

Thus, while Atiku presided over the attempts to privatize these firms, it is misleading to say they were fully privatized under his watch.

A Process Dogged by Corruption Allegations

One claim that has held up under scrutiny is that the privatization programme was riddled with corruption, mismanagement, and undervaluation of assets. Independent reports and media investigations from that period repeatedly raised red flags. Companies were sold for figures considered far below their market worth. In some cases, transactions were reversed after complaints of shady practices.

For many Nigerians, the outcome of privatization did not translate into better services or a stronger economy. Instead, it bred a new class of politically connected business elites who scooped up assets.

Success or Failure?

Looking back, the record of the Obasanjo-Atiku privatization programme is mixed at best. While it set the stage for reforms in sectors like banking and power, its poor execution left a bitter taste. For instance, NITEL’s collapse paved the way for private telecom operators like MTN and Glo, but it also represented the waste of a once-proud national asset.

Supporters of Atiku argue that he should be praised for pushing reforms in a country where public enterprises had become a drain on national resources. Detractors counter that the programme he oversaw was a failure, burdened by corruption and poor planning.

The Political Weight of Privatization

More than a decade later, the legacy of privatization remains a double-edged sword for Atiku Abubakar. Each election season, his role resurfaces—sometimes as evidence of his economic boldness, other times as a stain of corruption.

What is clear is that the claims often thrown around in political debates—such as that he fully privatized NITEL or that the process was a roaring success—do not hold up to facts. Atiku was in charge, yes, but the outcomes were far more complex and controversial.

Big background claims


Federal Secretariat, Ikoyi (the 15-storey complex)


Refineries sale & reversal (May–June 2007)


ALSCON (Aluminium Smelter)


NPA & Ports reforms (2004–2006)


Nigerian Railway Corporation


Nigerdock


NITEL / NECOM House


Nigeria Airways & assets


Nigeria Reinsurance & NICON Insurance


Transcorp Hilton (Abuja) / NICON Luxury (Abuja)


Eleme Petrochemicals & NAFCON (Onne)


Ughelli & Egbin power plants


Bacita Sugar, Sunti Sugar, MM2, Daily Times, etc.


Onigbolo Cement (Benin–Nigeria bi-national plant)


Poverty, GDP, life expectancy, textiles (the 2002 snapshot)


$16bn power spending under Obasanjo


Mikano generators


National Shipping Line (NNSL)


Quick answers to the “who bought what?” list (where verifiable)


Conclusion

Atiku Abubakar’s record on privatization highlights the challenges of reforming Nigeria’s economy. It was a programme full of ambition but crippled by mismanagement and lack of transparency. The story of Nigeria’s privatization under Obasanjo and Atiku is not one of outright success or failure, but rather a cautionary tale of how policy execution can make or break reform.

Exit mobile version